Skip to main content
Opinion: Matthew Knies Trade Is a Win, but Chayka Overpaid on the Details

Photo: Jenn G from Seattle, WA, Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Opinion

Opinion: Matthew Knies Trade Is a Win, but Chayka Overpaid on the Details

LeafsLurkerSep 29, 20267 min read

Table of Contents

Our verdict on the Matthew Knies trade

The Matthew Knies trade makes the Maple Leafs a better hockey team tonight, and that is the first thing that matters. Kirill Marchenko is a better offensive player than Knies, he fits what Jim Hiller wants to play, and Auston Matthews now has a right-shot winger who can finish and carry the puck. On the ice, Toronto won Monday's deal.

Off the ice, John Chayka paid too much. The extra pieces he threw in, the contract he absorbed and the price of the extension add up to a deal that is better for Columbus than it needed to be. Our grade: B-minus. Right idea, expensive execution.

For the record, this site argued in the summer that Toronto should ignore the Knies sell-high talk. That argument was built on a specific premise: that nobody would offer a player clearly better than Knies. Marchenko is that player. The premise broke, so the conclusion changes.

Why Marchenko is the better player

Start with the numbers that are not in dispute. Marchenko has led Columbus in goals three straight seasons, 81 across 233 games. He scored 74 points in 2024-25 and 67 last season, both on a team that was rarely good. Knies' career high is 66 points, set last season in 79 games, much of it riding shotgun with Matthews.

That last detail is the one Leafs fans do not love hearing. Knies' production came on the most favourable deployment in Toronto: first-line minutes beside a three-time Rocket Richard winner. Marchenko's came while driving his own line in Columbus. Put him where Knies was, and the reasonable expectation is more, not the same.

Then there is style. Hiller's camp has been about pace, puck possession through the neutral zone and fewer dump-ins. Marchenko is a rush player at 6-foot-3. Knies is a wall-and-net-front player who does his best work after someone else gets the puck into the zone. Both are useful. Only one of them is what this coaching staff has been asking for since the first week of camp.

Where Chayka overpaid

Knies for Marchenko, straight up, would have been a defensible hockey trade that most people would call close. That is not what happened. Toronto also sent Emil Andrae, a young left-shot defenceman who had been skating in Morgan Rielly's group in camp, and a conditional 2027 second-round pick. Toronto also took Miles Wood's $2.5-million contract, which Columbus had just waived, and Elvis Merzlikins, a goaltender coming off shoulder surgery.

Some of that is cap engineering and some of it is just cost. Wood and Merzlikins are problems Columbus solved by sending them to Toronto. The Blue Jackets cleared a contract they did not want, moved an injured goalie they could not use, and got a 23-year-old power forward signed through 2030-31 at $7.75 million. Daily Faceoff called Columbus the winner of a win-win. That is a fair read of the paperwork.

Waddell also told reporters there were no serious talks with other clubs because Toronto was the team that could give him NHL players. If that is accurate, Chayka was not in a bidding war on Monday. He was the only bidder, and he still added the pick and the prospect.

The extension is the real price

The piece that will be argued about longest is not the trade. It is the six years at $12.5 million. Marchenko will make more than Drake Batherson, more than Ryan Leonard and more than William Nylander starting in 2027-28, despite never having scored 35 goals.

We understand why it happened. Marchenko was a year from free agency and had been noncommittal about staying in Columbus. Trading Knies for a potential one-year rental would have been indefensible, so the extension was the condition of the deal. But it means Toronto paid a top-of-market number to a player whose best season is 74 points, and it paid it before seeing him play a single game with Matthews.

The fair comparison is not "Marchenko versus Knies." It is "Marchenko at $12.5 million versus Knies at $7.75 million." The first is an easy call. The second requires Marchenko to be roughly $4.75 million a year better for six years. That is a real bar.

What Toronto lost that the stat sheet misses

Knies was the only young core forward on this roster who played with a physical edge every night. He was homegrown, a 2021 second-round pick who developed into a first-liner, and he was the player fans pointed to when they argued this team finally had some sandpaper. Trading him the day before the 100th season opens is a message: Chayka does not care about that narrative.

That is fine in principle. Sentiment is not a strategy. But the Leafs' forward group is now noticeably softer at the top. Matthews, Marchenko, Nylander, Tavares and an 18-year-old Gavin McKenna are a skilled group. None of them is Knies in a board battle in the Florida zone in March. Nick Paul, Brandon Duhaime and Zack MacEwen can bring it in the bottom six. Whether that is enough against the Panthers and Lightning is a question for the spring.

What would make this an A

Three things. First, Marchenko scores 35-plus with Matthews and the top line becomes one of the league's best. Second, the cap savings this season — roughly $3.9 million on the Knies-to-Marchenko swap — get turned into a real addition before the deadline, most obviously the third-line centre this roster still lacks. Third, Knies does not become a 30-goal, 70-point player in Columbus on a contract $4.75 million cheaper than the one Toronto just signed.

The first two are in Chayka's control. The third is not, and it is the one that will be thrown at him every time the Blue Jackets visit.

The timing argument cuts both ways

Chayka made this trade 26 hours before the season opener, and there are two ways to read that. The generous version: he waited out the market, let Waddell's asking price soften as camp injuries piled up around the league, and struck when Columbus finally had to decide. The less generous version: Toronto's interest leaked over the weekend, Waddell knew exactly who he was dealing with, and the Leafs paid a deadline premium on a trade that had no deadline.

Waddell's own comments lean toward the second reading. He said talks had been on and off for weeks and picked up again once the news was public. If other clubs were not seriously involved, the extra second-round pick and Andrae look less like the cost of winning an auction and more like the cost of wanting it done before opening night.

There is also the chemistry cost. Marchenko will play his first game with Matthews in a regular-season game that counts, possibly without a full practice, depending on when his visa clears. Hiller had four pre-season games to build lines around Knies. That work now starts over in October.

The bottom line

We would rather see a GM swing for a better player than preserve a fan favourite out of fear. Chayka swung. Marchenko is better than Knies, and a Leafs team that finished with 78 points last season needed more scoring, not more of the same. The problem is not the decision. It is the invoice.

Check back in April. If Marchenko is in the top 20 in goals and Toronto is in a playoff spot on the Atlantic standings, nobody will remember Andrae or the second-round pick. If he is a 28-goal winger on a bubble team, they will remember everything.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Matthew Knies trade?

It is too early to say definitively. Marchenko is the more productive player, with 81 goals over the past three seasons, but Columbus also received Emil Andrae and a conditional 2027 second-round pick and shed Miles Wood's contract. Several analysts, including Daily Faceoff, graded Columbus slightly ahead.

Why did the Leafs trade Matthew Knies?

Columbus wanted NHL-ready players for Kirill Marchenko rather than picks, and Knies was the centrepiece that made the trade work. Toronto believes Marchenko's speed and rush offence fit Jim Hiller's system better beside Auston Matthews.

Is Kirill Marchenko better than Matthew Knies?

Offensively, yes by the numbers. Marchenko had 74 points in 2024-25 and 67 in 2025-26, while Knies' career high is 66 points last season. Knies is the more physical player and is more than two years younger.

How old is Matthew Knies?

Knies is 23. Toronto drafted him in the second round in 2021 and he signed a six-year, $46.5-million contract in June 2025 that runs through 2030-31.

What did the Blue Jackets get for Kirill Marchenko?

Columbus received Matthew Knies, Steven Lorentz, Emil Andrae and a conditional 2027 second-round pick. It also sent Miles Wood and Elvis Merzlikins to Toronto and retained 18 per cent of Merzlikins' salary.

Is Kirill Marchenko's contract an overpay?

It is at the top of the winger market. His $12.5-million AAV from 2027-28 is higher than Drake Batherson's $10.75 million and Ryan Leonard's $10.5 million, and higher than William Nylander's $11.5 million, though Marchenko has never scored 35 goals in a season.

Share this article