Skip to main content
The Auston Matthews Offensive Zone Experiment Is Hiller's Real Change

Photo: TheAHL, Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0)

Analysis

The Auston Matthews Offensive Zone Experiment Is Hiller's Real Change

LeafsLurkerSep 19, 20267 min read

Table of Contents

The Auston Matthews offensive zone handover is Hiller's biggest call

The most important thing Jim Hiller has said in his first Maple Leafs training camp has nothing to do with lines. It is about Auston Matthews offensive zone freedom — that he wants Toronto's elite forwards, Matthews above all, to create instead of execute. After two seasons in which the Leafs' best players were asked to execute a structure first and create second, the new head coach is inverting the order.

"I think the first thing you do is look at the team and the players on the team," Hiller said. "There are some elite offensive forwards in particular, so I think we have to let them play to their strengths."

That is a coaching philosophy delivered as a shrug, and it is a direct repudiation of what came before.

What the Berube years actually cost Matthews

Craig Berube's system did what it was hired to do. Toronto became harder to play against and more disciplined without the puck. It also coincided with the two least productive full seasons of Matthews' career.

The 2025-26 numbers are the starkest: 27 goals and 26 assists in 60 games, 0.45 goals per game and 0.88 points per game, both career lows outside of his rookie year. Injuries are a real part of that explanation — he missed the final 16 games after MCL surgery — but they are not the whole of it. His per-game rates were down before he got hurt.

Some of that is a structured system taxing the league's best goal-scorer. When a coach demands that centres hold position defensively and support low in the zone, the player who loses the most is the one whose value comes from being available in dangerous ice. Matthews spent a lot of the past two years being responsible.

We went through what Hiller's system changes when he was hired in June. What has become clearer in camp is that the defensive rebuild is not meant to come out of the stars' offence.

The takeaway number is the tell

Here is the statistic Hiller's staff appears to be building around: Matthews averaged 1.35 takeaways per game across the past two seasons. That is an elite figure for a forward, and it is the part of his game that survived both the injuries and the system.

Matthews has always been a better defensive player than his reputation suggests, and specifically a better puck-thief. He reads passing lanes, he closes on the puck carrier, and he strips pucks in the neutral zone. In a conservative structure, those takeaways mostly turn into a controlled exit and a line change. In a faster, more aggressive system, they turn into rush chances with the best shooter alive carrying the puck.

That is the whole thesis. Hiller is not trying to make Matthews a different player. He is trying to convert a skill Matthews already has into offence instead of into safety.

"Fast and hard-skating" is a demand, not a slogan

Hiller has run camp with heavy emphasis on skating — a lot of up-and-down work, a lot of pace. His stated goal is a team that is fast and hard-skating in both directions. Coaches say this every September. The reason to take it more seriously here is the roster Chayka built to match it.

Look at the summer additions. Jack Roslovic is a speed winger. Darren Raddysh moves the puck. Emil Andrae's entire case is mobility. Teddy Blueger and Colton Sissons are skating bottom-six centres. Gavin McKenna is an 18-year-old whose game is built on pace and manipulation. Toronto did not add size and grit this summer. It added skating.

A roster constructed that way playing a trap-heavy, position-first system would be a waste. The team and the system appear to have been designed together, which is more than Toronto could say about most of the past decade.

The power play is where this gets tested first

Five-on-five freedom is hard to see in a single game. The power play is not. Toronto finished 25th on the man advantage last season, a collapse we went through in detail, and it is the clearest place to judge whether the new staff has actually changed anything.

The personnel is largely the same. Matthews in his office, Nylander on the flank, Knies at the net front, Rielly or Raddysh at the point. A unit with that much ability finishing 25th is not a talent problem. It is a movement problem — too much standing, too predictable an entry, too few looks that force a penalty kill to rotate.

If Hiller's stated preference for letting skilled players improvise is real, the power play is where it shows up in October rather than January. Watch the zone entries. A unit that gains the line with possession more often than it dumps and chases is a unit that has been given permission to think.

McKenna is the second beneficiary

The other player this philosophy suits is the 18-year-old. Gavin McKenna's game is built on manipulation and pace, not on north-south simplicity, and he has opened camp on a line with John Tavares and William Nylander ahead of his preseason debut Saturday.

A rookie in a rigid system spends his first year being told where to stand. A rookie in Hiller's stated system gets to play, with a veteran centre behind him cleaning up the mistakes. That is a meaningfully better development environment for a player Toronto cannot send to the minors, and it is probably not an accident that the coach and the No. 1 pick arrived in the same summer.

The risk is obvious and worth naming

Toronto allowed 299 goals last season. That is not a number you fix by giving your forwards more licence.

The honest version of the concern is this: the Leafs were bad defensively under a defence-first coach, and they are now hiring freedom. If the structure loosens and the goals-against does not improve, Hiller will have traded a 78-point season for a different flavour of 78-point season.

The counterargument is that Toronto's defensive problems last season were not primarily about the forwards' positioning. They were about a blue line that could not exit the zone and a goaltending situation in flux. Chayka addressed both — rebuilding the defence corps and signing Sergei Bobrovsky to pair with Anthony Stolarz. If those fixes hold, the forwards can afford to hunt.

That is the bet. It is not a small one, and it rests on a 37-year-old goaltender and a defence with three regulars over 30.

What it means for Matthews specifically

Matthews is 29 this season and coming off two years that have already dropped him to No. 14 on TSN's Top 50, a fall we argued is defensible on the evidence. He has said he feels the best he has in a long time. Chayka has cleared him completely.

Put a healthy Matthews in a system built to generate rush offence, with a legitimate right-shot option beside him for the first time since Mitch Marner left, and the case for a bounce-back writes itself. Fifty goals is not a stretch if he plays 80 games. Neither is 45 and a genuine Hart conversation.

The flip side is that there are no more excuses available. Hiller is removing the constraint that Matthews' defenders have pointed to for two years. If the offence does not come back, the explanation has to be something else.

What's next

The first live look comes Saturday, when Toronto hosts Montreal at Scotiabank Arena in the home half of a split-squad doubleheader. Matthews is on a line with Matthew Knies and Roslovic. Preseason hockey reveals very little about systems, but it reveals something about pace, and pace is the whole point of what Hiller says he is building.

Toronto opens the regular season against the Canadiens on Sept. 29. By mid-October the standings will start answering whether freedom was the right prescription, or whether the Leafs just found a new way to lose 3-2.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Jim Hiller's system with the Maple Leafs?

Hiller has emphasized a fast, hard-skating team in both directions, with more freedom for Toronto's elite offensive forwards in the offensive zone. He has said the starting point is looking at the players on the roster and letting them play to their strengths, a departure from the structure-first approach under Craig Berube.

How many takeaways does Auston Matthews average?

Matthews averaged 1.35 takeaways per game across the past two seasons, an elite rate for a forward. Hiller's staff sees that puck-stripping ability as a source of transition offence rather than just a defensive skill.

Why did the Maple Leafs fire Craig Berube?

Berube was let go on May 13, 2026 after two seasons, following a 32-36-14 campaign in which Toronto finished last in the Atlantic Division and missed the playoffs. The club hired former Los Angeles Kings head coach Jim Hiller as his replacement in June 2026.

How many goals did the Maple Leafs allow last season?

Toronto allowed 299 goals in 2025-26. That figure is the central risk in Hiller's plan to loosen the offensive structure, and it is why John Chayka rebuilt the blue line and signed goaltender Sergei Bobrovsky over the summer.

Who did the Maple Leafs add in the 2026 offseason?

Toronto added at least nine new faces, including No. 1 pick Gavin McKenna, goaltender Sergei Bobrovsky, defencemen Darren Raddysh and Emil Andrae, and forwards Jack Roslovic, Teddy Blueger, Colton Sissons and Brandon Duhaime. Most of the additions share a common trait: skating.

Can Auston Matthews score 50 goals again in 2026-27?

It is plausible if he stays healthy. Matthews scored 69 goals in 2023-24 but has not reached 30 in either of the past two injury-shortened seasons. A full 80-game year in a system designed to generate rush offence puts 45 to 50 within realistic range.

Who coached the Maple Leafs before Jim Hiller?

Craig Berube coached Toronto for two seasons before being fired on May 13, 2026. Hiller, previously the head coach of the Los Angeles Kings, was named the 41st head coach in Maple Leafs history in June 2026.

Share this article