Photo: Michael Barera, Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Gavin McKenna Benching Was Hiller's Mistake. Play Him Past Game 9
Table of Contents
The Gavin McKenna benching was a mistake. Don't let it become a habit.
The Gavin McKenna benching in Toronto's 5-4 overtime loss to Buffalo on Oct. 15 was not a disciplinary message and it was not an injury. By Jim Hiller's own account, it was an oversight. McKenna played 6:36, took his last shift with 9:40 left in the second period, and watched the rest of the second, all of the third and all of overtime from the bench while the Sabres erased a 4-2 lead.
Hiller owned it afterward. Per Daily Faceoff, he said a stretch of penalties in the second period left McKenna sitting for a long time, that he then chose not to send him back out, and that he probably should have put him on the ice to start the third. "The big thing is the penalties. I guess it just didn't happen and that's on me," he said.
Fine. Coaches make bench mistakes. But this one lands three days before the most consequential roster date of Toronto's season, and it should push the Leafs toward a clear answer: McKenna plays his 10th game on Oct. 19, plays real minutes in it, and stays.
What the nine-game window actually decides
McKenna, 18, is on a three-year entry-level contract signed in July at a $1.075 million cap hit, per the Leafs' contract sheet. Because of his age, he can play nine NHL games this season without the first year of that deal being used. The 10th game burns it, and it cannot be undone. Our full explainer on the nine-game window covers the mechanics.
Toronto has played eight games, and McKenna has dressed for all eight. Here is how the calendar falls:
DateOpponentMcKenna NHL gameContract effectOct. 15Buffalo SabresNo. 8Entry-level year can still slideOct. 17New York IslandersNo. 9 (if he dresses)Last game before the thresholdOct. 19San Jose SharksNo. 10 (if he dresses)Year 1 of the ELC is usedSliding the deal would delay McKenna's restricted free agency by a year and push his expensive second contract back. That has real value to a cap-managing front office. But it only works if McKenna spends the rest of 2026-27 outside the NHL lineup. Nobody credible has reported that Toronto is considering that, and on the evidence of eight games, it would be a hockey mistake.
The evidence says he belongs
McKenna entered the Buffalo game with two goals and three assists in seven games while averaging 15:00 a night. His first NHL goal came against Nashville on Oct. 6, a top-shelf finish off an Auston Matthews pass in a 5-4 overtime win. When Hiller moved him to the third line, the line started generating chances, which we argued was a move Hiller should leave alone. He has also been part of Toronto's power-play mix, and we made the case that he belongs on the first unit even with Tavares healthy.
He is minus-2 through eight games, and his debut on Sept. 29 was quiet. None of that is unusual for an 18-year-old against NHL competition. Five points in eight games on a team scuffling at 3-3-2 is not a player who needs more seasoning. It is a player who needs ice time.
The real cost of Thursday's short bench
The bigger issue with the benching is not McKenna's feelings. It is that Toronto played the third period of a one-goal game with a short forward group, and then lost John Tavares to injury early in that same period after a collision with Josh Norris. By overtime, Hiller was running a thin rotation with his rookie glued to the bench.
Buffalo scored at 10:05 and 12:16 of the third, both on point shots by defencemen, and won on Owen Power's goal at 3:14 of overtime. McKenna would not have stopped either third-period goal on his own. But fresh legs late in a game are a defensive asset too, and Toronto's third-period rush defence has been a problem all season — something we flagged in our look at the Leafs' rush-defence leak.
The counterargument, fairly stated
The case for sliding McKenna's contract is about 2029, and it is not a silly case. If Year 1 is burned, his entry-level deal ends after 2028-29, as the cap sheet lists it. Toronto would then be negotiating his second contract while already carrying Kirill Marchenko's six-year, $12.5 million extension (which starts in 2027-28), William Nylander at $11.5 million through 2032 and Darren Raddysh at $8.5 million through 2034. Auston Matthews' $13.25 million deal expires after 2027-28, so whatever he signs next will already be on the books.
PlayerCap hitContract runs throughAuston Matthews$13,250,0002027-28Kirill Marchenko (extension)$12,500,0002032-33William Nylander$11,500,0002031-32Darren Raddysh$8,500,0002033-34Gavin McKenna (ELC)$1,075,0002028-29 if Year 1 is burnedOne more cheap year of McKenna would help a cap that crowded. That is the honest version of the slide argument. It still loses, because the price is pulling a productive top-nine forward out of the lineup for an entire season in which the Leafs are trying to win. The cap rises, contracts get moved and plans change; a lost development season does not come back.
Hiller has to fix this in public
Hiller said he would talk to McKenna. Good. The better response is in the lineup. With Tavares's status unknown, Max Domi and Dakota Joshua on long-term injured reserve, and newly acquired centre Aatu Räty starting with the Marlies, Toronto does not have enough healthy forwards to leave its most skilled young one sitting.
Saturday against the Islanders, McKenna should be back near 15 minutes with his power-play time intact. If Tavares is out, McKenna is one of the few Leafs forwards who can carry the puck through the neutral zone, and the second line needs exactly that with Kirill Marchenko coming off a hat trick. Nothing about Thursday changes what McKenna has shown. It only makes the bench look worse.
Our take: burn the year
The slide argument is a spreadsheet argument. It saves money in 2029. The hockey argument is about now: Toronto is in a crowded Atlantic Division, has dropped points after leading Vegas 3-0 and Buffalo 4-2, and has already lost Chris Tanev week-to-week and now possibly Tavares. Removing a five-points-in-eight-games forward from that roster to protect a future RFA year would be the wrong kind of cautious.
John Chayka drafted McKenna first overall to be the bridge from the Matthews-Nylander era to whatever comes next. Bridges get built by playing. Dress him Saturday, dress him Monday against San Jose, and stop treating the first year of his deal like the asset. McKenna is the asset.
What to watch next
The lineup for the Oct. 17 Islanders game and McKenna's ice time in it will say more than any post-game quote. If he is back near his 15-minute average, Thursday was a one-off. If he is dressed but sheltered, the Leafs are giving themselves an exit. And if he is in the lineup on Oct. 19 against the Sharks, the debate is over — which is where it should end.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was Gavin McKenna benched against the Sabres?
Jim Hiller said a run of penalties in the second period kept McKenna on the bench for a long stretch and he then chose not to send him back out. Hiller said he probably should have played him in the third period and called it his mistake. McKenna finished with 6:36 of ice time.
How many games can Gavin McKenna play before his contract year counts?
McKenna can play nine NHL games in 2026-27 without using the first year of his three-year entry-level contract. His 10th NHL game burns that year, and it cannot be reversed.
When would Gavin McKenna play his 10th NHL game?
McKenna has dressed for all eight Toronto games through Oct. 15. If he plays on Oct. 17 against the New York Islanders, his 10th game would be Oct. 19 at home against the San Jose Sharks.
What are Gavin McKenna's stats this season?
McKenna had two goals and three assists in seven games before the Sabres game, averaging 15:00 of ice time, and went pointless against Buffalo. His first NHL goal came on Oct. 6 against Nashville.
What is Gavin McKenna's contract with the Maple Leafs?
McKenna signed a three-year entry-level contract in July 2026 with a cap hit of $1,075,000. Toronto drafted him first overall in the 2026 NHL Draft.
Will the Maple Leafs send Gavin McKenna down?
There has been no credible report that Toronto plans to remove McKenna from the NHL lineup. Sliding his contract would require him to spend the rest of 2026-27 outside the NHL, which would delay his restricted free agency by a year.


